Published On: Fri, May 2nd, 2025

How a rise in disinformation on Chinese social media is targeting voters


Political disinformation targeting voters on Chinese social media platforms has surged over the past five years, but has been exacerbated by this federal election campaign.

In a research document viewed by 9news.com.au, thousands of examples of misleading or factually incorrect political information on Mandarin language apps like WeChat and RedNote, recorded over a five-year period, were laid bare.

The RECapture project, led by University of Melbourne research fellow Dr Fan Yang, uncovered exaggerated or false information about both the major parties on the platform.

This misinformation is often driven by protagonists with a commercial interest., in particular migration, real estate and education agencies.

The platforms: WeChat and RedNote

WeChat is the primary social media service for Mandarin speakers around the world and is used by more than 70 per cent of Chinese Australians.

But the recent rise of RedNote, or Xiaohongshu – think China’s answer to Instagram – has also led to a rise in disinformation narratives targeting migrant communities.

More than 70 per cent of Chinese Australians tend to consume news and information on WeChat, according to research from the University of Melbourne. (AAP)

On WeChat, third-party news outlets often repurpose news taken from trusted Australian and global news sources, by translating them for their Mandarin audiences.

But the research found intentional mistranslations or misinterpretations sometimes clouded the overall view shaped by the articles.

Almost 30 per cent of Chinese Australians reported encountering “made-up news” at the 2022 federal election, according to research from the Lowy Institute.

A further 34 per cent of respondents said they were not confident in recognising misinformation or disinformation in news.

University of Melbourne postdoctoral research fellow Dr Fan Yang has monitored media posts on WeChat since 2019. (Supplied)

A post to WeChat from March 25, titled, “Warning! The policy suddenly changed, and a large number of Chinese may be deported!”, has been viewed over 20,000 times.

The post is accompanied by an image of ICE officers in the US and opens with anecdotes relating to the deportation of illegal immigrants back to China from the United States.

The post also falsely claims “tens of thousands of Chinese may be deported” and accuses both major parties of backing the policy.

The March 25 post to WeChat has been viewed over 20,000 times. (Nine)

“Some Chinese-language media outlets here in Australia have repurposed the news and they take out the context of the incident,” Yang said.

Disinformation narratives on WeChat are “nothing new”, according to Yang, but the federal election campaign has exacerbated the issue.

“Election campaigns, especially the intensity of politicians coming out to talk to people and the intensity of media coverage of Australian politicians, just give those businesses more opportunities to exploit any lines from those politicians,” Yang said.

TikTok’s volatility pushes users towards a new threat

In January, Western users flocked to RedNote – known for its short video functionality – as uncertainty surrounded the future of TikTok in the United States.

Downloads in Australia also surged, but it wasn’t just consumers taking interest in RedNote, or Xiaohongshu, which translates to “little red book” in English.

RedNote is known for its short video functionality. (AP)

Yang said disinformation narratives identified on RedNote were “quite similar” to those on WeChat, but the volume of misleading content was “double or even triple”.

The AEC confirmed it was aware of the issue on RedNote and has “already received a number of referrals from Australian RedNote users about electoral content for the upcoming federal election”.

“The AEC assesses and, when appropriate, actions referrals made by users of social media platforms,” a spokesperson said.

Who is behind disinformation narratives?

A “significant amount” of misleading content is commercially driven, Yang said.

Yang and the RECapture research team identified migration, real estate and education agencies exploiting election policies to monetise fears and anxieties within the Chinese migrant communities for business gain.

“They have been playing a big part in manipulating the line of policies or manipulating a specific line of Australian politicians to distribute commercially driven disinformation,” Yang said.

“Elections mean social change is going to happen, so that also opens up the opportunity for those migration agencies or those business entities to … exploit those anxieties from the public for their own business gain.”

As an example, one video posted to RedNote last month suggested Immigration minister Tony Burke was keen on cancelling visas.

The caption implored Chinese migrants to apply for permanent residency before immigration policies are tightened, backed up by a business pitch from a migration agent.

The AEC does not currently have an active presence on WeChat or RedNote, but said it was “able to investigate content on these platforms if it is referred to us”.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) told 9news.com.au it “does not have a formal regulatory role in misinformation or disinformation” and does not monitor it during elections.



Source link